Business and Architecture
AI Cost vs ROI Simulator: When Token Burn Becomes Business Value
Does this AI workflow create enough value to justify total operating cost and risk?
AI ROI is not proven by claiming that AI is cheaper than humans. It is proven when the use case produces measurable business value after accounting for implementation cost, inference cost, monitoring, failure risk, governance, adoption, and the opportunity cost of not acting.
Interactive simulator
Run the ROI simulation
Choose a domain, use case, objective, and routing strategy. Adjust any assumption. See cost, value, payback, ROI, and a worth-vs-not-worth recommendation.
Selected use case context
—
The research basis and use-case facts here are fixed external context. The cost, value, payback, and recommendation numbers elsewhere on this page are model outputs — they update as you change routing, automation, geography, or any assumption.
Select a use case with a workflow diagram to view it.
—
Routing strategy meaning
—
Automation level meaning
—
Scenario sensitivity controls
Use these sliders to stress-test adoption, token price, review load, and implementation uncertainty without losing the researched scenario defaults.
Recommendation
Adjust inputs to see the recommendation.
Scenario: —
Default outcome: —
Financial Outputs
Priority View
—
Monthly Cost Breakdown
Cost Mix Donut
Value-to-Net Waterfall
Monthly Value Breakdown
Automation Level Comparison
| Option | Monthly Cost | Cost per Task | Net Value | Payback | Recommendation |
|---|
Readiness & Risk Dimensions
Formula transparency
How the simulator calculates
Every formula is visible and explainable. The simulator does not use opaque scoring — all math can be traced from inputs to outputs.
Token cost per task
Human-led monthly cost
Monthly AI OpEx
Gross monthly value
Risk-adjusted value
Net value & payback
Readiness factor
Deterministic tool monthly
Scenario-grounded sources
Research sources for each use case
Every use case is grounded in a specific set of empirical research sources. Switch use cases above and the linked citations below update to show exactly which studies, benchmarks, and analyst reports back that scenario's defaults, research-basis narrative, and economic assumptions. Sources not cited by the current scenario are listed separately for transparency. All defaults remain editable.
Research-first rule
Every scenario is designed after collecting reference economics. The page does not invent defaults first and cite them later.
Worth vs not-worth
The simulator intentionally includes scenarios that produce strong ROI, pilot-only, fix-prerequisites, and not-worth-pursuing outcomes.
Loading citations…